Herbs or harm? Forest seizure sparks outcry in Arunachal’s Gandhi Market

A controversy erupted in Arunachal Pradesh’s capital on April 8 after forest officials seized bundles of wild herbs and forest vegetables from women vendors at Gandhi Market, citing biodiversity laws — a move that has triggered protests and sparked debate over traditional rights and due process.

Among the items seized were wild banana flowers (Musa balbisiana), Indian prickly ash (Zanthoxylum rhetsa), and aromatic litsea (Litsea cubeba) — herbs commonly used in tribal diets and traditional medicines. None of the plants are endangered, with all three listed as "Least Concern" on the IUCN Red List.

Vendors expressed anger and helplessness over the crackdown.“These are not wild animals or endangered species,” said one elderly vendor. “These herbs are part of our tradition and livelihood. If there’s a ban, inform us first — don’t harass us!”

Yapung Rigia, another affected seller, added emotionally: “What should we do if this is banned? These sales feed our families every day. Either let us sell or give us government jobs!”

The operation was reportedly triggered by concerns raised by the Papum Pare Biodiversity Management Committee, particularly over the sale of wild animal meat and forest items. The drive was allegedly conducted based on a Deputy Commissioner’s order dated March 27.

Also Read: Arunachal border towns face intensive ILP checks; Banderdewa police enforce daily inspections

In a surprising twist, officials from the Forest Department have denied authorizing the seizure, raising serious questions about jurisdiction, due process, and communication gaps between administrative bodies.

Legal experts point out that under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, sale of forest produce is regulated — but not outright banned — especially when it concerns non-endangered species harvested traditionally from private or jhum cultivation lands. Sustainable harvesting is allowed if it doesn’t involve forest encroachment or biodiversity loss.

The incident has stirred a wave of criticism online, with citizens and activists denouncing what they call a “clampdown on cultural survival.” Many argue the focus should be on empowering local vendors, not penalizing them.

As the controversy unfolds, the need for transparent communication, inclusive policymaking, and respect for traditional knowledge has never been more urgent. For now, the vendors of Gandhi Market await answers — and respect for their roots.