Feb 16, 2024
Aims to curb exploitation of individuals seeking treatment for congenital diseases like deafness, dumbness, and autism by "magical healers."
Supporters see it as crucial to protect vulnerable individuals, while critics argue traditional practices aren't always harmful and should be respected.
Enforcement could be tricky, especially in remote areas, and defining "magical healing" might be difficult. Balancing cultural sensitivity with protection will be crucial.
Raises questions about cultural heritage and freedom of religious belief. Open communication and education alongside enforcement are key.
Some genuine practitioners might be unfairly targeted. Alternative livelihood options and awareness campaigns may be needed.
Draws parallels with existing laws in other Indian states, offering insights into potential successes and failures.
Effectiveness will be judged by reduced exploitation, improved healthcare access for vulnerable groups, and respect for cultural sensitivities.